Xiomára Gonzales nackt sorted by
relevance

Admin20.08.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

California, , 137-38, 110 S.
4606
Admin29.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

" Snowden next relayed that Height called defendant again, this time to tell her that he would lead her to the Garden State Parkway because he had to turn back, and that he would meet her again later.
Admin05.09.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

2d 112, 118-19, 124 1990 , rejected the inadvertence prong of the plain-view exception.
2405
Admin23.08.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

The panel remanded the case for further proceedings in light of its suppression of the evidence.
36010
Admin05.09.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

The State asks us to reverse the Appellate Division on either of two grounds: the police did not have to discover the drugs inadvertently or, alternatively, the inadvertence prong was satisfied, as the trial court found.
3905
Admin19.08.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

Since Horton, a majority of states have followed suit and removed the inadvertence requirement from the plain-view analysis.
Admin29.06.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

For the reasons that follow, we reverse.
4505
Admin14.08.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

In an opinion authored by Justice Stewart, a plurality of the Court articulated three requirements for the plain-view exception: 1 the officer must be lawfully in the viewing area when making the observation, seeid.
9500
Admin09.08.2021

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. XIOMARA GONZALES :: 2015 :: New Jersey Superior Court, Appellate Division

In reaching this conclusion, the panel did not address the fact that, since Bruzzese, the United States Supreme Court has expressly held that the inadvertent discovery of incriminating evidence is not a prerequisite for plain-view seizure.
6102
Admin17.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

Height s Impala, defendant s Camry, and the van drove in a convoy for five to ten minutes -- followed by the surveillance team -- to 256 South 7th Street in Newark, the location of one of Thompson s suspected stash houses.
3104
Admin28.06.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

The officers then pulled defendant over as she entered the Parkway in a congested area of the roadway.
3004
Admin26.07.2021

New Jersey v. Gonzales :: 2016 :: Supreme Court of New Jersey Decisions :: New Jersey Case Law :: New Jersey Law :: US Law :: Justia

Krakora, Public Defender, attorney; Matthew Astore, Deputy Public Defender, on the letter brief.
8304